© Getty Images

Understanding swatting - Swatting is a dangerous prank where perpetrators falsely report critical emergencies (like bomb threats or shootings) to provoke heavily armed police responses. This practice often targets high-profile figures, wasting resources and risking innocent lives.

© Shutterstock

Deadly consequences -

In the past, swatting has led to tragedies, including fatal heart attacks and police shootings of unsuspecting victims. In Kansas, a man was killed after police responded to a false homicide report.

© Getty Images

Trump team targeted -

Several members of Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks have faced swatting incidents recently, with threats directed at their homes. Victims include candidates for roles like the Defense Department and Labor Secretary.

© Getty Images

Rise to infamy -

Swatting isn’t a new tactic, and the Department of Homeland Security has noted that it has plagued communities for decades. Schools, hospitals, and even video gamers have fallen victim, and the frequency continues to grow.

© Getty Images

Etymology -

The word “swatting” comes from the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams that are usually deployed when high-risk threats are called in. But SWAT teams are not the only ones who respond.

© Getty Images

Motives -

Swatting is used to intimidate or harass victims, disrupt critical operations, or gain notoriety. Both domestic and foreign actors exploit this tactic, leveraging fear and chaos to achieve their goals.

© Shutterstock

A costly misuse of resources -

Swatting not only endangers lives but also drains critical police and emergency resources. Aside from SWAT teams, bomb squads and ambulances are also diverted from real crises in order to address issues that turn out to be hoaxes.

© Getty Images

Unique challenges -

Unlike other crimes, swatting relies on exploiting trust in emergency systems. Law enforcement must navigate a minefield of misinformation and unpredictable scenarios, often with little room for error in high-pressure situations.

© Getty Images

The psychology of fear -

Hoaxers thrive on creating chaos and fear. They make false reports of active shooter scenarios, hostage crises, or bomb threats, leaving their targets vulnerable and law enforcement on high alert. This increases the chance of missteps.

© Getty Images

Gaming’s role -

Swatting gained notoriety in gaming communities, where disputes during live streams often escalated into swatting calls. Popular streamers like Clara Sorrenti (known as Keffals online, pictured) have decried the phenomenon after becoming targets.

© Getty Images

A chilling example -

In 2017, a swatting hoax stemming from a gaming dispute led to a police shooting. A Californian man, Tyler Barriss (pictured), was sentenced to 20 years for his role in the crime.

© Getty Images

A ‘fad’ with deadly stakes -

What started as a “prank” in gaming communities has transformed into a widespread harassment technique that has only grown in scale. Its persistence has been fueled by a blend of malicious intent and anonymity.

© Shutterstock

Tech-savvy - Perpetrators often use sophisticated technology like caller ID spoofing and voice masking to evade detection. These tools make it challenging for authorities to identify culprits and hold them accountable.

© iStock

Cross-border complications -

Swatters operating internationally use free online tools to make calls over the internet and mask their locations. This further complicates law enforcement’s ability to track them, as calls originating overseas often appear as domestic.

© Shutterstock

The FBI steps in -

To combat the growing problem, the FBI launched a database in 2023 to track swatting incidents nationwide. Their efforts aim to improve response coordination and identify patterns in this dangerous practice.

© Getty Images

Criminal repercussions -

Swatting can lead to severe felony charges, as seen in Barriss’s case. However, offenders often escape accountability due to their ability to anonymize their actions, leaving victims vulnerable and justice elusive.

© Shutterstock

A digital battlefield -

Swatting is one of many examples of the dangers that arise when unchecked online behavior spills into real life. The ease with which hoaxers exploit technology to wreak havoc truly points to the gaps that exist in holding people accountable over the internet.

© Shutterstock

A pattern of threats -

Aside from the recent string of swatting incidents against political figures, many other high-profile figures have consistently been targets of such dangerous hoaxes. Let’s take a look at who they are.

© Shutterstock

Ashton Kutcher -

In October 2012, police stormed Ashton Kutcher’s Hollywood Hills home following a false report of a shooting and hostage situation. A 12-year-old boy from Southern California later confessed to this prank, as well as a 911 call to skip school.

© Getty Images

Justin Bieber -

The same boy who targeted Kutcher also made a prank 911 call a few days after, claiming that an armed assailant was seen waving his gun near Justin Bieber’s home in Los Angeles. The pop star was on tour at the time.

© Getty Images

Tom Cruise -

In January 2013, police responded to a fake report of an armed robbery at Tom Cruise’s Beverly Hills home. The hoax consumed significant emergency resources, but no suspects were identified or charged for the prank.

© Getty Images

Caitlyn Jenner and Kris Kardashian -

Police swarmed the home of Caitlyn Jenner and Kris Kardashian in January 2013 after a fake 911 call reported gunfire. The Kardashians condemned the hoax, with Kim Kardashian stating such pranks are not amusing, despite Caitlyn Jenner posing humorously with officers afterward.

© Getty Images

Chris Brown -

In January 2013, a false report claimed Chris Brown was threatening his wife with a gun at his Hollywood Hills residence. Police found only staff present, but the hoax's believability was heightened due to Brown’s 2009 assault conviction involving Rihanna.

© Getty Images

Clint Eastwood -

In February 2013, a swatter falsely reported armed men at Clint Eastwood’s Bel-Air home. Police responded swiftly, but no suspects were ever caught for the bold hoax.

© Getty Images

Selena Gomez -

A disturbing swatting incident in April 2013 involved a false claim that Selena Gomez’s father had killed her mother and was threatening to burn their home down. Police were unable to identify the prankster, who may have been tied to similar incidents involving other celebrities.

© Getty Images

Miley Cyrus -

Miley Cyrus became a swatting victim twice in 2013, with one hoax involving a false claim of shots fired and someone hiding in her home. Neither prankster was apprehended, but these incidents highlighted the growing trend of targeting celebrities with swatting hoaxes.

© Getty Images

Heightened awareness -

Increased awareness of swatting’s risks has sparked calls for better tracking, stricter penalties, and more effective emergency protocols. But prevention remains a challenge due to the inherently deceptive nature of the tactic.

© Shutterstock

Filtering calls -

Being able to identify fraudulent calls is one of many ways in which law enforcement has attempted to minimize the effects of swatting. This is especially true for calls that are received through the nation’s non-emergency numbers.

© Shutterstock

Vigilance -

Authorities emphasize the importance of public awareness and proactive measures to combat swatting. Ultimately, people have a duty to maintain the peace, and it includes avoiding disruptions that could result in the loss of life.

Sources: (USA Today) (Encyclopedia Britannica) (The Washington Post) (The Indianapolis Star)

See also: How the Trump family spends their billions

© Shutterstock