© Getty Images

Undermining democracy -

In September 2024, the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) named seven major companies that are undermining democracy. Among them are technology, oil, and private equity firms.

© Getty Images

Evading accountability -

The ITUC considers seven major companies, in particular, as drivers of evading accountability and also funding controversial political movements, including far-right initiatives.

© Getty Images

Blackstone -

Blackstone is the largest private equity firm in the world. It is also the largest private real-estate owner, heavily profiting from the effects of the 2008 financial crisis on the housing market.

© Getty Images

The 2008 financial crisis -

The 2008 financial crisis began in the United States, but quickly spread around the world. Financial institutions took big risks in issuing credit for mortgages, called subprime mortgages, for low-income people who didn’t have stable means to continuously make monthly payments.

© Getty Images

Subprime mortgages -

Banks aggregated all these high-risk mortgages together and sold them as safe and profitable investments. When interest rates started increasing, those who took out subprime mortgages couldn’t make their payments, leading to a huge drop in housing prices.

© Getty Images

Credit freeze -

Suddenly, the safe and profitable housing market investments revealed themselves as high-risk, leading to the near collapse of major financial institutions. Credit froze, and businesses and individuals couldn’t take out loans, slowing down the economy significantly.

© Getty Images

Mass layoffs -

Mass layoffs led to a surge in unemployment rates and, at the risk of a complete collapse of the economy, the US intervened to bail out financial institutions from complete collapse.

© Getty Images

Economic devastation -

Yet, there were still a few sectors that were able to profit from its devastating effects, namely private equity firms, debt collectors, foreclosure services, and certain financial traders.

© Getty Images

Blackstone -

One such company was Blackstone. The company alone generated US$7 billion following the 2008 financial crisis, which led to over nine million home foreclosures and the collapse of the housing market in the United States.

© Getty Images

Homeownership -

The effects of the crisis were primarily devastating for African American and Latino families, who, historically, had already faced challenges in homeownership and access to mortgages.

© Getty Images

Competing with the economic power -

Low-income homeowners were unable to access credit during the crisis, and much less capable of competing with the economic power of big firms. The suffering of low-income homeowners marked a significant opportunity for firms like Blackstone.

© Getty Images

Profit from federal bailout -

As people were kicked out of their homes due to their inability to pay their mortgages, banks and investors found a way to profit through the federal bailout.

© Getty Images

Rental cash cows -

As a pioneer, Blackstone began buying foreclosed homes, tending to necessary improvements, and then renting them out, turning homes previously owned by individual buyers into rental cash cows.

© Getty Images

Invitation Homes -

Through the company’s subsidiary, Invitation Homes, they purchased upwards of 48,000 homes between 2012 and 2016 at reduced prices through auctions or at very low prices.

© Getty Images

Blackstone -

Ultimately, Blackstone invested around US$10 billion in their efforts to flip homes, subsequently disrupting local rental markets with high rental prices.

© Getty Images

Collaboration with major banks -

Blackstone then collaborated with major banks like J.P. Morgan and Deutsche Bank to aggregate the value of profitable rental properties and sell it as a bond to investors, similar to the risky patterns that caused the 2008 financial crash.

© Getty Images

Converting homes -

By converting previously owned homes into lucrative rentals and subsequently profiting from property appreciation, meaning the increase in property value, the housing market was reshaped.

© Getty Images

Housing availability -

Availability of housing, purchasing and rental prices, and housing policies have all been dominated by institutional investors, giving them corporate control over the housing market.

© Getty Images

Influential in global real estate -

Blackstone owns rental properties throughout the world, as well as logistics and warehouse facilities, hospitality chains, and student housing, making it one of the most influential entities in the global real estate market.

© Getty Images

Assets over US$1 trillion -

To understand the sheer domination of Blackstone: the firm has a market value of approximately US$130 billion, with assets well over $1 trillion.

© Getty Images

Stephen Schwarzman -

Stephen Schwarzman, who heads the firm, has also invested in funding Trump’s reelection campaign, efforts to advance deforestation in the Amazon forest, and fossil fuel projects.

© Getty Images

Eliminate regulations -

The ITUC report notes, “Blackstone’s network has spent tens of millions of dollars supporting politicians and political forces who promise to prevent or eliminate regulations that might hold it to account.”

© Getty Images

Housing as assets -

Because Blackstone views housing as assets, its ultimate goal is to generate the maximum amount of profits possible for itself. When housing is merely treated as a lucrative product, it is pulled away from its function as a basic human necessity.

© Getty Images

Maximum profit -

By purchasing large numbers of properties and turning them into rental units at the highest rents possible, companies like Blackstone drive housing prices up. They reduce the possibility for the average person to access affordable rental housing and raise the prices of property to such an extent that becoming a homeowner is increasingly challenging.

© Getty Images

Housing instability -

On a community level, this can be very disruptive, as these actions are geared toward housing instability. The cheaper properties become before companies like Blackstone swoop in, the more their potential profit margin grows.

© Getty Images

Housing unaffordable for locals -

This aspect of housing instability also contributes to making whole neighborhoods suddenly unaffordable for locals, as they can’t keep up with rising housing costs. This trend is often linked to gentrification.

© Getty Images

Gentrification -

Gentrification refers to when property values of a particular neighborhood or area increase to such an extent that low-income residents are displaced from their homes in favor of more affluent renters or buyers.

© Getty Images

Inflation -

Cities like New York City, Berlin, London, and Los Angeles provide a clear example of such behavior. Blackstone’s housing acquisition tactics cause prices to inflate to such a degree that locals can no longer afford to live in their neighborhoods.

© Getty Images

Decrease in housing availability -

Since the company acquires large amounts of property at a time, it simultaneously creates a decrease in housing availability. In New York City alone Blackstone owns over 10,000 properties.

© Getty Images

Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village -

While that may not seem like a lot in a city of over two million housing units, the neighborhoods where it has invested suffered major destabilization. In 2015, Blackstone acquired Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village (11,000 unit building for US$5.3 billion), marking one of the biggest real estate deals in the city’s history. Today, the units are worth upwards of $8 billion.

Sources: (The Guardian) (MSN) (BBC) (United Nations) (Common Dreams) (International Business Times UK) (Fox 5) (Business Wire)

See also: Cities being overrun by tourists

© Getty Images